![]() 06/02/2015 at 17:58 • Filed to: Volvo Xc90 | ![]() | ![]() |
Not bad for something that was introduced in 2002.
![]() 06/02/2015 at 18:01 |
|
My dad used to have one with the 2.4 I5 Diesel and a manual back in 07-08. Did 30mpg all day long.
![]() 06/02/2015 at 18:02 |
|
Agreed.
I will also hold that this is also an underrated (or undernoticed) classic design. It looked great when it came out and I still see them on the road and think they look better than most of the crossovers (SUVs?) I see on the road today. This was a complete and utter win. Just not in that burnt orange.
![]() 06/02/2015 at 18:02 |
|
So did the S80
![]() 06/02/2015 at 18:03 |
|
no
![]() 06/02/2015 at 18:03 |
|
they’re cheap enough now....
but I feel that any Volvo I could afford is a Volvo I wouldn’t want.
![]() 06/02/2015 at 18:04 |
|
Ehhhhh, not really.
I mean, except the seats.
![]() 06/02/2015 at 18:04 |
|
Yes, it has aged pretty well. The only issue is that a certain demographic has gotten ahold of them :-/
![]() 06/02/2015 at 18:05 |
|
How was reliability?
![]() 06/02/2015 at 18:05 |
|
It’s aged well...so long as you don’t compare to the new XC90. That beauty just makes it look ancient.
![]() 06/02/2015 at 18:05 |
|
No. But the second generation is aging quite well
![]() 06/02/2015 at 18:05 |
|
(¬¬) this guy
![]() 06/02/2015 at 18:06 |
|
lying is bad and you shouldn’t do it
![]() 06/02/2015 at 18:06 |
|
both have
![]() 06/02/2015 at 18:07 |
|
Yes, they are really cheap now.
Most Volvos depreciate pretty badly though
![]() 06/02/2015 at 18:07 |
|
Looks straight out of the mid 90’s to me.
![]() 06/02/2015 at 18:07 |
|
Very true. But the price of the 1st gen XC90 makes it appealing.
![]() 06/02/2015 at 18:08 |
|
This would be mid-90s styling
![]() 06/02/2015 at 18:09 |
|
‘97 then
![]() 06/02/2015 at 18:09 |
|
Bought brand new in 2007, owned for maybe eleven months and 25,000 miles. Not long enough to make any statement about reliability.
![]() 06/02/2015 at 18:11 |
|
That year was more boxy
![]() 06/02/2015 at 18:11 |
|
Good sir, I never lie, but I will not take that strike against my honor sitting down.
![]() 06/02/2015 at 18:12 |
|
Nasty. I feel blessed that I’ve never seen such a thing in person.
As for the S80 that's debatable.
![]() 06/02/2015 at 18:14 |
|
![]() 06/02/2015 at 18:14 |
|
Never seen one of those, but looks quite a bit like a Durango.
![]() 06/02/2015 at 18:15 |
|
fairly boxy
![]() 06/02/2015 at 18:16 |
|
Not really, less than the Volvo. I’ve got a ‘97 A4.
![]() 06/02/2015 at 18:18 |
|
Visually, yes. Mechanically, no.
![]() 06/02/2015 at 18:22 |
|
The Durango looks a bit like the XC90, fixed.
![]() 06/02/2015 at 18:26 |
|
Hehe
![]() 06/02/2015 at 18:27 |
|
That gen Durango/Dakota needs to be erased from existence.
![]() 06/02/2015 at 18:30 |
|
The only thing that makes that Volvo look old is that it has too much Glass Area.
You can see out of it! That just won’t do today.
![]() 06/02/2015 at 18:40 |
|
These look great from all angles except the direct side.
![]() 06/02/2015 at 18:41 |
|
swoon. Love me a 2nd gen S80
![]() 06/02/2015 at 18:59 |
|
Haha, theyre all kinda terrible
![]() 06/02/2015 at 19:01 |
|
They look like Anteaters.
![]() 06/02/2015 at 20:17 |
|
I don't know why everyone is hating on it. It has the engine from a Noble M600!!! Or... Something like that...
![]() 06/02/2015 at 20:53 |
|
DoYouEvenVolvo?
I can kind of see it. If anything the dodge is trying to mimic the XC90 as LongbowMkII.
![]() 06/02/2015 at 20:54 |
|
I concur. They are truly hateful things. I've never been in one but its so bad I can judge without siting in it.
![]() 06/02/2015 at 20:54 |
|
Ha, the new XC90 still has quite a bit of greenhouse as well.
![]() 06/02/2015 at 20:59 |
|
I have not sir, never seen one of those actually.
Not a fan of Durangos anyways, the only thing going for them was the Hemi.